79330419.2-306Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Criminal ProcedureSentence; Judgment; Execution Of SentenceGeneral ProvisionsRevocation of suspension of sentence and probationCode 1950, § 53-275; 1958, c. 468; 1970, c. 275; 1975, c. 495; 1978, c. 687; 2002, c. 628; 2016, c. 718.Grant v. CommonwealthRecord No. 811421223 Va. 6801982-06-18https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1361073/grant-v-commonwealth/ . . . appellee. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Davis v. Com.Record No. 1763-88-4402 S.E.2d 6841991-03-19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1217358/davis-v-com/ . . . within the time limits established under Code § 19.2-306, Davis asserts the circuit court erred by . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Smith v. CommonwealthRecord No. 801941284 S.E.2d 5901981-12-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1302066/smith-v-commonwealth/ . . . quot;was within the Court's authority under § 19.2-306 of the Virginia Code". For purposes of . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Hamilton v. CommonwealthRecord No. 760122217 Va. 3251976-10-08https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1417017/hamilton-v-commonwealth/ . . . suspension fixed by the court is provided by Code | 19.2-306. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Carbaugh v. Com.Record No. 0607-93-4449 S.E.2d 2641994-10-11https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1326406/carbaugh-v-com/ . . . been originally imposed. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Hartless v. Com.0433983510 S.E.2d 7381999-02-23https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1066478/hartless-v-com/ . . . conditions as the court shall determine.... . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Briggs v. Com.1443942464 S.E.2d 5121995-12-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1068150/briggs-v-com/ . . . the statutory period of suspension under Code § 19.2-306 ran from the date of the first order. If . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>NUCKLOES v. Com.Record No. 0048-90-2407 S.E.2d 3551991-08-06https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1376528/nuckloes-v-com/ . . . quot;was within the Court's authority under § 19.2-306." Smith, 222 Va. at 702, 284 S.E.2d at . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Wright v. Com.2306982526 S.E.2d 7842000-04-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1065817/wright-v-com/ . . . period of suspension fixed by the court.... . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Connelly v. Com.Record No. 1165-91-2420 S.E.2d 2441992-07-28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1274972/connelly-v-com/ . . . #39;s compliance with its earlier order. Code § 19.2-306; see Bassett v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Grant v. CommonwealthRecord No. 811421223 Va. 6801982-06-18https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1361073/grant-v-commonwealth/ . . . appellee. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Davis v. Com.Record No. 1763-88-4402 S.E.2d 6841991-03-19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1217358/davis-v-com/ . . . within the time limits established under Code § 19.2-306, Davis asserts the circuit court erred by . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Smith v. CommonwealthRecord No. 801941284 S.E.2d 5901981-12-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1302066/smith-v-commonwealth/ . . . quot;was within the Court's authority under § 19.2-306 of the Virginia Code". For purposes of . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Hamilton v. CommonwealthRecord No. 760122217 Va. 3251976-10-08https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1417017/hamilton-v-commonwealth/ . . . suspension fixed by the court is provided by Code | 19.2-306. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Carbaugh v. Com.Record No. 0607-93-4449 S.E.2d 2641994-10-11https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1326406/carbaugh-v-com/ . . . been originally imposed. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Hartless v. Com.0433983510 S.E.2d 7381999-02-23https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1066478/hartless-v-com/ . . . conditions as the court shall determine.... . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Briggs v. Com.1443942464 S.E.2d 5121995-12-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1068150/briggs-v-com/ . . . the statutory period of suspension under Code § 19.2-306 ran from the date of the first order. If . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>NUCKLOES v. Com.Record No. 0048-90-2407 S.E.2d 3551991-08-06https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1376528/nuckloes-v-com/ . . . quot;was within the Court's authority under § 19.2-306." Smith, 222 Va. at 702, 284 S.E.2d at . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Wright v. Com.2306982526 S.E.2d 7842000-04-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1065817/wright-v-com/ . . . period of suspension fixed by the court.... . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Connelly v. Com.Record No. 1165-91-2420 S.E.2d 2441992-07-28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1274972/connelly-v-com/ . . . #39;s compliance with its earlier order. Code § 19.2-306; see Bassett v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/19.2-306//19.2-306/19.2/18/1/19.2-30617.1-275.919.2-295.2:119.2-31119.2-316.1In any case in which the court has suspended the execution or imposition of sentence, the court may revoke the suspension of sentence for any cause the court deems sufficient that occurred at any time within the probation period, or within the period of suspension fixed by the court. If neither a probation period nor a period of suspension was fixed by the court, then the court may revoke the suspension for any cause the court deems sufficient that occurred within the maximum period for which the defendant might originally have been sentenced to be imprisoned.sectionAA1The court may not conduct a hearing to revoke the suspension of sentence unless the court issues process to notify the accused or to compel his appearance before the court within one year after the expiration of the period of probation or the period of suspension or, in the case of a failure to pay restitution, within three years after such expiration. If neither a probation period nor a period of suspension was fixed by the court, then the court shall issue process within one year after the expiration of the maximum period for which the defendant might originally have been sentenced to be incarcerated. Such notice and service of process may be waived by the defendant, in which case the court may proceed to determine whether the defendant has violated the conditions of suspension.sectionBB1If the court, after hearing, finds good cause to believe that the defendant has violated the terms of suspension, then: (i) if the court originally suspended the imposition of sentence, the court shall revoke the suspension, and the court may pronounce whatever sentence might have been originally imposed or (ii) if the court originally suspended the execution of the sentence, the court shall revoke the suspension and the original sentence shall be in full force and effect. The court may again suspend all or any part of this sentence and may place the defendant upon terms and conditions or probation.sectionCC1If any court has, after hearing, found no cause to impose a sentence that might have been originally imposed, or to revoke a suspended sentence or probation, then any further hearing to impose a sentence or revoke a suspended sentence or probation, based solely on the alleged violation for which the hearing was held, shall be barred.sectionDD1Nothing contained herein shall be construed to deprive any person of his right to appeal in the manner provided by law to the circuit court having criminal jurisdiction from a judgment or order revoking any suspended sentence.sectionEE1