7805901-210Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016General ProvisionsCommon Law And Rules Of ConstructionRules Of Construction And DefinitionsComputation of timeCode 1919, § 5; 1932, p. 24; Code 1950, § 1-13; 1950, pp. 21, 23, §§ 1-13.3, 1-13.27; 1962, cc. 104, 284, § 1-13.3:1; 1977, c. 93; 1986, c. 166; 1987, c. 92; 2005, c. 839; 2008, c. 816; 2010, c. 96; 2014, c. 596.Watkins v. Com.0649964494 S.E.2d 8591998-01-20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067152/watkins-v-com/ . . . purposes of the agreement on detainers. Code § 53.1-210, Art. IV(c). Further, there is no dispute . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr> . . . Ardith Cavallo, and Lawrence Cavallo v. Star Enterprise . . . 95-2540100 F.3d 11501996-11-20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/729758/ardith-cavallo-and-lawrence-cavallo-v-star-enterprise-texaco-refining-and/ . . . See, e.g., Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1, 210-11, 6 L. Ed. 23 (1824). . . . Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitValentine v. Com.Record No. 1587-92-4443 S.E.2d 4451994-05-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1334177/valentine-v-com/ . . . Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, Code §§ 53.1-210 to 53.1-215; and (2) abused its discretion . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr> . . . Leaman H. Caswell v. Judith N. Lang, in Re Leaman H. . . . 84-1502757 F.2d 6081985-03-19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/449484/leaman-h-caswell-v-judith-n-lang-in-re-leaman-h-caswell-debtor/ . . . at 1092]. See also Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 210-211 [6 L.Ed. 23] (1824). And, specifically, . . . Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNeblett, Adm'r v. HunterRecord No. 6236207 Va. 3351966-09-09https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1253989/neblett-admr-v-hunter/ . . . contrary to the provisions of Code 1950, section 46.1-210(2), hence incorrectly stated the law. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr> . . . John Wesley Stewart v. Randy Bailey Larry Huffman Cindy S. . . . 92-69117 F.3d 3841993-09-29https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/655305/john-wesley-stewart-v-randy-bailey-larry-huffman-cindy-s-staton-other/Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitPrice v. Com.1345963485 S.E.2d 6551997-06-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067445/price-v-com/ . . . disposition of the pending charges, pursuant to Code § 53.1-210, Article III. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Cofield v. NucklesRecord Nos. 881265, 881290387 S.E.2d 4931990-01-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1261039/cofield-v-nuckles/ . . . ordinances of the City of Newport News, and § 46.1-210."[7] . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Delgado v. Com.Record No. 1063-91-4428 S.E.2d 271993-03-09https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1288384/delgado-v-com/ . . . Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), Code §§ 53.1-210 to 53.1-215. Specifically, appellant . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr> . . . Ida M. Kale and Lester E. Kale v. Martin F. Douthitt, and . . . 7933_1274 F.2d 4761960-01-22https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/249995/ida-m-kale-and-lester-e-kale-v-martin-f-douthitt-and-automatic/ . . . overtaking and passing set forth in 46.1-208, 46.1-210, and 46.1-212.' . . . Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuithttp://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/1-210//1-210/1/2.1/2/1-21016.1-24117.1-20717.1-705.2When an act of the General Assembly or rule of court requires that an act be performed a prescribed amount of time before a motion or proceeding, the day of such motion or proceeding shall not be counted against the time allowed, but the day on which such act is performed may be counted as part of the time. When an act of the General Assembly or rule of court requires that an act be performed within a prescribed amount of time after any event or judgment, the day on which the event or judgment occurred shall not be counted against the time allowed.sectionAA1Any court or proceeding authorized to be adjourned from day to day shall not be required to meet on a Sunday or legal holiday.sectionDD1When an act of the General Assembly or local governing body, order of the court, or administrative regulation or order requires, either by specification of a date or by a prescribed period of time, that an act be performed or an action be filed on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday or on any day or part of a day on which the state or local government office where the act to be performed or the action to be filed is closed, the act may be performed or the action may be filed on the next business day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day on which the state or local government office is closed.sectionEE1For the purposes of this section, any day on which the Governor authorizes the closing of the state government shall be considered a legal holiday.sectionFF1