79062918.2-111Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Crimes And Offenses GenerallyCrimes Against PropertyEmbezzlement And Fraudulent ConversionsEmbezzlement deemed larceny; indictmentCode 1950, § 18.1-109; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1979, c. 349; 1994, c. 555; 2003, c. 733.If any person wrongfully and fraudulently use, dispose of, conceal or embezzle any money, bill, note, check, order, draft, bond, receipt, bill of lading or any other personal property, tangible or intangible, which he shall have received for another or for his employer, principal or bailor, or by virtue of his office, trust, or employment, or which shall have been entrusted or delivered to him by another or by any court, corporation or company, he shall be guilty of embezzlement. Proof of embezzlement shall be sufficient to sustain the charge of larceny. Any person convicted hereunder shall be deemed guilty of larceny and may be indicted as for larceny and upon conviction shall be punished as provided in § 18.2-95 or § 18.2-96.section1Roberts v. Com.Record No. 841128337 S.E.2d 2551985-11-27https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1256373/roberts-v-com/ . . . response to a motion filed pursuant to Code § 18.2-111, to designate in writing the statute upon . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Evans v. Com.Record No. 821755308 S.E.2d 1261983-10-14https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1295659/evans-v-com/ . . . embezzlement under § 18.2-111, or false pretenses under § 18.2-178. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Waymack v. Com.Record No. 1555-85358 S.E.2d 7651987-08-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1216466/waymack-v-com/ . . . the statutory crime of embezzlement under Code § 18.2-111,[1] it is necessary to prove that the . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Smith v. Com.Record No. 801893283 S.E.2d 2091981-10-16https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1330737/smith-v-com/ . . . the statutory offense of embezzlement. Code § 18.2-111.[1]*211 The corpus delicti is not in . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Greenwalt v. Com.Record No. 811770297 S.E.2d 7091982-12-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1356251/greenwalt-v-com/ . . . feloniously embezzling $2,500 in violation of Code § 18.2-111. A preliminary hearing on this felony . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Com. v. Bruhn020774570 S.E.2d 8662002-11-01https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059287/com-v-bruhn/ . . . embezzlement." Code § 18.2-111. The only reference to larceny in Code § 18.2-111 is in its second . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>George v. Com.0332064655 S.E.2d 432008-01-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1062879/george-v-com/ . . . embezzlement pursuant to Code § 18.2-111") and Code § 18.2-111.2 (an employer's wrongful . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Covil v. Com.040036604 S.E.2d 792004-11-05https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059026/covil-v-com/ . . . Appeals. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Gwaltney v. Com.Record No. 2500-92-1452 S.E.2d 6871995-01-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1385482/gwaltney-v-com/ . . . conviction for embezzlement in violation of Code § 18.2-111. Gwaltney contends the trial court . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Zoretic v. Com.Record No. 1408-90-4409 S.E.2d 8321991-10-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1409022/zoretic-v-com/ . . . establish the crime of embezzlement under Code § 18.2-111, the Commonwealth *834 must prove that . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-111/18.2-95Grand larceny defined; how punished/18.2-95/18.2-96Petit larceny defined; how punished/18.2-96//18.2-111/18.2/5/4/18.2-11118.2-152.818.2-51338.2-181058.1-38336.2-945