77395718.2-119Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Crimes And Offenses GenerallyCrimes Against PropertyTrespass To RealtyTrespass after having been forbidden to do so; penaltiesCode 1950, § 18.1-173; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1982, c. 169; 1987, cc. 625, 705; 1991, c. 534; 1998, cc. 569, 684; 2011, c. 195.If any person without authority of law goes upon or remains upon the lands, buildings or premises of another, or any portion or area thereof, after having been forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, by the owner, lessee, custodian, or the agent of any such person, or other person lawfully in charge thereof, or after having been forbidden to do so by a sign or signs posted by or at the direction of such persons or the agent of any such person or by the holder of any easement or other right-of-way authorized by the instrument creating such interest to post such signs on such lands, structures, premises or portion or area thereof at a place or places where it or they may be reasonably seen, or if any person, whether he is the owner, tenant or otherwise entitled to the use of such land, building or premises, goes upon, or remains upon such land, building or premises after having been prohibited from doing so by a court of competent jurisdiction by an order issued pursuant to §§ 16.1-253, 16.1-253.1, 16.1-253.4, 16.1-278.2 through 16.1-278.6, 16.1-278.8, 16.1-278.14, 16.1-278.15, 16.1-279.1, 19.2-152.8, 19.2-152.9 or § 19.2-152.10 or an ex parte order issued pursuant to § 20-103, and after having been served with such order, he shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. This section shall not be construed to affect in any way the provisions of §§ 18.2-132 through 18.2-136.section1Martin v. Com.Record No. 1707-89-2414 S.E.2d 4011992-01-21https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1235726/martin-v-com/ . . . to only the offenses of unlawful entry, Code § 18.2-119, and attempted capital murder. Code §§ . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr> . . . Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul . . . 84-1009775 F.2d 12741985-11-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/460183/bruce-beaudett-v-city-of-hampton-city-attorneys-a-paul-burton-and-w/ . . . 's criminal trespass statute, Va.Code Sec. 18.2-119. On each occasion he was fined and . . . Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitReed v. Com.Record No. 1023-86-2366 S.E.2d 2741988-03-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1272164/reed-v-com/ . . . with criminal trespass in violation of Code § 18.2-119, which prohibits unlawfully remaining upon . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Lowe v. Com.0080003535 S.E.2d 6892000-10-17https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1065466/lowe-v-com/ . . . § 18.2-51 and trespass in violation of Code § 18,2-119.[1] On appeal, he contends (1) his first . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Baker v. Com.081715685 S.E.2d 6612009-11-05https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058296/baker-v-com/ . . . in Code § 18.2-119. Baker maintains that any reasonable interpretation of Code § 18.2-119 . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>O'BANION v. Com.2698974531 S.E.2d 5992000-07-25https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1065597/obanion-v-com/ . . . concealed weapon, in contravention of Code §§ 18.2-119 and 18.2-308.2, respectively. We granted . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Taylor v. Com.Record No. 0027-88-2400 S.E.2d 7941991-02-05https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1202427/taylor-v-com/ . . . therefore, we do not consider whether Code §§ 18.2-119 through 18.2-136.1 or any other statutory . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Com. v. Hicks011728596 S.E.2d 742004-04-23https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059101/com-v-hicks/ . . . for [its] record. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr> . . . Northern Virginia Women's Medical Center Thomas H. . . . 79-1161617 F.2d 10451980-03-14https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/375920/northern-virginia-womens-medical-center-thomas-h-gresinger-md-jane-doe/Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitRaab v. Com.0972061652 S.E.2d 1442007-10-30https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1062929/raab-v-com/ . . . cited the general trespassing statute, Code § 18.2-119, arguing that there can be no reasonable . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-119/16.1-253Preliminary protective order/16.1-253/16.1-253.1Preliminary protective orders in cases of family abuse; confidentiality/16.1-253.1/16.1-253.4Emergency protective orders authorized in certain cases; penalty/16.1-253.4/16.1-278.14Criminal jurisdiction; protective orders; family offenses/16.1-278.14/16.1-278.15Custody or visitation, child or spousal support generally/16.1-278.15/16.1-278.2Abused, neglected, or abandoned children or children without parental care/16.1-278.2/16.1-278.6Status offenders/16.1-278.6/16.1-278.8Delinquent juveniles/16.1-278.8/16.1-279.1Protective order in cases of family abuse/16.1-279.1/18.2-132Trespass by hunters and fishers/18.2-132/18.2-136Right of certain hunters to go on lands of another; carrying firearms or bows and arrows prohibited/18.2-136/19.2-152.10Protective order/19.2-152.10/19.2-152.8Emergency protective orders authorized/19.2-152.8/19.2-152.9Preliminary protective orders/19.2-152.9/20-103Court may make orders pending suit for divorce, custody or visitation, etc/20-103//18.2-119/18.2/5/5/18.2-11915.2-1717.118.2-308.1:119.2-169.319.2-303.223-28923.1-3208