77786218.2-200Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Crimes And Offenses GenerallyCrimes Involving FraudMiscellaneous False And Fraudulent ActsFailure to perform promise to deliver crop, etc., in return for advancesCode 1950, § 18.1-113; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.If any person obtain from another an advance of money, merchandise or other thing, upon a promise in writing that he will send or deliver to such other person his crop or other property, and fraudulently fail or refuse to perform such promise, and also fail to make good such advance, he shall be deemed guilty of the larceny of such money, merchandise or other thing.section1Redman v. Com.1316963487 S.E.2d 2691997-07-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067370/redman-v-com/ . . . written request was made as required by Code § 18.2-200.1. The Supreme Court invoked the ends of . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Jimenez v. Com.Record No. 900771402 S.E.2d 6781991-03-01https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1217237/jimenez-v-com/ . . . such... advances," in violation of Code § 18.2-200.1. The jury found Jimenez guilty as charged . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Boothe v. Com.Record No. 0138-86-3358 S.E.2d 7401987-07-21https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1216699/boothe-v-com/ . . . convicted of construction fraud pursuant to Code § 18.2-200.1, based on a charge that he . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Holsapple v. Com.030334587 S.E.2d 5612003-10-31https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059170/holsapple-v-com/ . . . that does not appear in Code § 18.2-200.1. To construe Code § 18.2-200.1 as imposing a burden upon . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Norman v. Com.Record No. 0766-85346 S.E.2d 441986-07-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1318480/norman-v-com/ . . . such advances. We disagree and affirm. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Holsapple v. Com.3078002574 S.E.2d 7562003-01-14https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1064381/holsapple-v-com/ . . . performed in the future, in violation of Code § 18.2-200.1. In reaching this determination, the . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Rader v. Com.Record No. 0981-91-2423 S.E.2d 2071992-11-10https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1420564/rader-v-com/ . . . convicted of construction fraud in violation of Code § 18.2-200.1. Rader appeals on the grounds . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Klink v. Com.Record No. 1518-89-1407 S.E.2d 51991-07-01https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1376465/klink-v-com/ . . . sufficient to support a conviction under Code § 18.2-200.1 for failure to perform a promised . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>McCary v. Com.1666023590 S.E.2d 1102003-12-30https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1064007/mccary-v-com/ . . . construction fraud and larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-200.1. He challenges the verdict on the . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Mughrabi v. Com.Record No. 1946-01-1567 S.E.2d 5422002-08-06https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1243500/mughrabi-v-com/ . . . counts of construction fraud in violation of Code § 18.2-200.1. On appeal, he contends the trial . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-200//18.2-200/18.2/6/7/18.2-200