77155318.2-268.9Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Crimes And Offenses GenerallyCrimes Involving Health And SafetyDriving Motor Vehicle, Etc., While IntoxicatedAssurance of breath-test validity; use of breath-test results as evidence1992, c. 830; 1994, cc. 359, 363; 1996, cc. 154, 952; 1997, c. 256; 1999, c. 273; 2004, c. 1013; 2005, cc. 757, 840, 868, 881; 2006, c. 101; 2009, Sp. Sess. I, cc. 1, 4.Rollins v. Com.2378002554 S.E.2d 992001-10-30https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1064881/rollins-v-com/ . . . analysis for admission into evidence under Code § 18.2-268.9. Rollins objected to its admission, . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Rasmussen v. Com.1239984522 S.E.2d 4011999-12-28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1066017/rasmussen-v-com/ . . . objection was based on Code §§ 18.2-268.2 and 18.2-268.9. By its order of June 11, 1998, the . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Reynolds v. Com.1921983515 S.E.2d 8081999-06-29https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1066272/reynolds-v-com/ . . . provision from Code § 18.2-268.9. Effective July 1, 1999, amended Code § 18.2-268.9 provides in . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>James v. Com.Record No. 2173-92-4446 S.E.2d 9001994-08-02https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1347783/james-v-com/ . . . the Division of Forensic Science. See Code § 18.2-268.9. We disagree. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Luginbyhl v. Com.1333044628 S.E.2d 742006-04-04https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1063261/luginbyhl-v-com/ . . . the analysis and certificate pursuant to Code § 18.2-268.9.[2] The trial court convicted appellant . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Artis v. City of SuffolkRecord No. 1230-93-1450 S.E.2d 1651994-11-08https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1305855/artis-v-city-of-suffolk/ . . . t]he steps set forth in §§ 18.2-268.2 through 18.2-268.9 relating to taking, handling, . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Woolridge v. Com.Record No. 0121-98-2512 S.E.2d 1531999-03-23https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1383444/woolridge-v-com/ . . . Division of Forensic Science as required by Code § 18.2-268.9 or at the time of appellant's . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Frank Glading Shelton v. Commonwealth05850432005-02-22https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1063583/frank-glading-shelton-v-commonwealth/ . . . copy of the test result as required by Code § 18.2-268.9. The . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Anderson v. Com.2704952486 S.E.2d 1151997-06-17https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067425/anderson-v-com/ . . . evidence over appellant's objection. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Grant v. Com.0877084682 S.E.2d 842009-09-01https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1062371/grant-v-com/ . . . of the Department of Forensic Science. Code § 18.2-268.9. Grant argues that this attestation clause . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-268.9/18.2-266Driving motor vehicle, engine, etc., while intoxicated, etc/18.2-266/18.2-266.1Persons under age 21 driving after illegally consuming alcohol; penalty/18.2-266.1/18.2-268.2Implied consent to post-arrest testing to determine drug or alcohol content of blood/18.2-268.2/18.2-272Driving after forfeiture of license/18.2-272/19.2-187.1Procedures for notifying accused of certificate of analysis; waiver; continuances/19.2-187.1//18.2-268.9/18.2/7/2/18.2-268.918.2-268.1119.2-1878.01-44.5