Creation of Redevelopment Areas (§ 36-48)—Virginia Decoded

Creation of Redevelopment Areas

A redevelopment area as defined in § 36-3 may be created by an authority as provided in this chapter and a redevelopment plan may be adopted to address conditions in such redevelopment area. The redevelopment plan shall (i) outline specific boundaries for the redevelopment area and designate for acquisition such properties as are necessary or appropriate for the clearance, replanning, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of the redevelopment area, (ii) be adopted in accordance with § 36-49, and (iii) satisfy the requirements as set forth in § 36-51.

History

1946, p. 278; Michie Suppl. 1946, § 3145(8a); 1975, c. 455; 1988, cc. 572, 591; 2006, c. 784.

Download

Court Decisions

Hunter v. Redevelopment Authority (SCV, 11/30/53)
. . . the redevelopment statute (Code 1950, sections 36-48 through 36-53) was unconstitutional since it . . .

. . . 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1751, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,051 . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/30/76)
. . . In Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36, 48-49, 94 S.Ct. 1011, 39 L.Ed.2d 147 (1974) . . .

Williams v. Com. (SCV, 09/04/87)
. . . Turner v. Commonwealth, 221 Va. 513, 531, 273 S.E.2d 36, 48 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1011, 101 . . .

Housing Authority v. Denton (SCV, 06/18/56)
. . . case and need not be repeated here. . . .

. . . United States v. Victor Jermaine Lipford, United States of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 02/07/00)
. . . proceedings. See Olano , 507 U.S. at 732-36. . . .

. . . Lisa M. Beardsley v. John Webb, and John R. Isom, Sheriff of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 07/26/94)
. . . See Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36, 48-49, 94 S.Ct. 1011, 1019-20, 39 L.Ed.2d 147 . . .

Hollis v. Commonwealth (SCV, 04/23/76)
. . . Cal.2d 410, 428, 77 Cal.Rptr. 460, 472, 454 P.2d 36, 48 (1969). Upon opening the car door he . . .

. . . United States v. David Carson Jackson, United States of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 10/05/78)
. . . 1969), 70 Cal.2d 410, 77 Cal.Rptr. 460, 454 P.2d 36, 48, and People v. Krivda (1971), 5 Cal.3d 357, . . .

Inlet Authority v. Bastian (SCV, 03/07/66)
. . . public purpose of the 1946 Housing Act (Code || 36-48 ff. ) was not destroyed by a provision . . .

Frazier v. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 09/09/83)
. . . discrimination. . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.