Contracts with counties, cities and towns outside of district (§ 21-216)—Virginia Decoded

Contracts with counties, cities and towns outside of district

Any commission, and any county, city or town in whole or in part outside of the district, is authorized to enter into a contract on such terms and conditions as such contract may contain, providing for or relating to the treatment and disposal of sewage or industrial wastes originating in such county, city or town, by means of the sewage disposal system or such other facilities as the commission may determine to provide for such purpose, and such county, city or town is authorized to do everything necessary or proper to carry out and perform every such contract and to provide for the payment or discharge of any obligation thereunder by the same means and in the same manner as any other of its obligations.In the event any such contract is entered into in accordance with the provisions of this section, provision shall be made therein whereby the cost of rendering the services herein referred to, to such county, city or town, will be borne by such county, city or town.

History

1938, p. 527; Michie Code 1942, § 1560bbb.

Download

Court Decisions

Bollinger v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Roanoke County (SCV, 09/02/76)
. . . legislative capacity in issuing the permit; that Section 21-6 of the Roanoke County Code is . . .

. . . United States v. Stephen Palinkas, United States of America . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/26/91)
. . . be 37 to 46 months, based on an offense level of 21.6 The court departed upward to the five year . . .

BOARD OF SUP'RS v. Countryside Inv. Co. (SCV, 11/05/99)
. . . circuit court ruled, among other things, that §§ 21-6 and -7 of the Augusta County Subdivision . . .

. . . Federal Trade Commission v. Food Town Stores, Inc., and . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 08/13/76)
. . . share of the city market was 50.9%; Lowe's was 21.6%. Combined, the chains would command 72.5%, . . .

. . . Christopher Bacon D.B., the Infant Who Sues by and Through . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/23/07)
. . . Richmond Public Schools for fiscal year 2006 and $21.6 million over the next five years. Plaintiffs . . .

In Re Crafty Fox, Ltd. (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, 02/06/80)
. . . substantial revision of § 57k of the Act and General Order 21(6). Because these provisions have . . .

Westvaco Corp. v. COLUMBIA GAS OF VIRGINIA (SCV, 01/17/86)
. . . in 1978. In a 1980 FOR, the rate was reduced to 21.6 cents. Then, in its 1982 general rate case, . . .

National City Bank v. Turnbaugh (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 08/10/06)
. . . National Banking Act ("NBA"), . . .

Bacon v. City of Richmond (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/23/07)
. . . Richmond Public Schools for fiscal year . . .

United States v. Lighty (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 08/11/10)
. . . . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.