Unlawful to charge other than published tariff (§ 56-102)—Virginia Decoded

Unlawful to charge other than published tariff

When rates, fares, and charges excluding those covered by contracts have been published in a tariff, it shall be unlawful for any such company to charge, demand, collect, or receive from any person a greater or less compensation for the transportation of passengers or property, or for any services in connection therewith, than is specified in such published schedule of rates, fares, and charges, unless it is determined that a rate, fare or charge has been recorded in error.

History

Code 1919, § 3910; 1979, c. 106; 1996, cc. 114, 157.

Download

Court Decisions

. . . National Labor Relations Board v. Poinsett Lumber & . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 04/01/55)
. . . accordance with the provisions of sections 102.56, 102.57, and 102.58, insofar as applicable. Upon . . .

Cantrell v. Com. (COA, 10/18/88)
. . . be." Washington v. Chrisman, 455 U.S. 1, 5-6, 102 S.Ct. 812, 815-816, 70 L.Ed.2d 778 (1982). It . . .

United States v. George L. McKenley (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 02/06/90)
. . . United States, 488 U.S. 361, 109 S.Ct. 647, 655-56, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). . . .

Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. NORFOLK & WEST. RY. CO. (COA, 04/25/66)
. . . less than regular rates. It is unlawful under § 56-102 of the Code of Virginia for any railroad . . .

. . . Katia Gutierrez De Martinez Eduardo Martinez Puccini Henry . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 04/24/97)
. . . , see Pub.L. No. 100-694, §§ 5-6, 102 Stat. 4564 (codified at 28 U.S.C.A. § . . .

. . . Environmental Technology Council, Formerly Known as . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 10/15/96)
. . . before such a tax could be implemented. Id. at 154-56, 102 S.Ct. at 910-11. Congress required . . .

Early v. Travel Leisure Concepts, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 10/06/87)
. . . Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 255-56, 102 S.Ct. 252, 266, 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981). . . .

Galustian v. Peter (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/15/10)
. . . choice of forum. Piper Aircraft, 454 U.S. at 255-56, 102 S.Ct. 252. This lack of deference is muted, . . .

Carter v. Trafalgar Tours Ltd. (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 01/19/89)
. . . chosen his home forum for adjudication. Id. at 255-56, 102 S.Ct. at 265-66; Koster v. Lumbermens . . .

. . . South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. Federal Trade . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/27/06)
. . . City of Boulder, 455 U.S. 40, 47-48, 50, 53-54, 56, 102 S.Ct. 835, 70 L.Ed.2d 810 (1982) (same); . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.