77816165.2-308Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Workers' CompensationApplication And Effect Of TitleDischarge of employee for exercising rights prohibited; civil action; relief1982, c. 327, § 65.1-40.1; 1986, c. 259; 1991, c. 355.Mullins v. Virginia Lutheran Homes, Inc.960961479 S.E.2d 5301997-01-10https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060088/mullins-v-virginia-lutheran-homes-inc/ . . . Inc. (the employer). She alleged under Code § 65.2-308[1] that the employer discharged her because . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Dunn v. Bergen Brunswig Drug Co.Civ. A. No. 2:93cv1127848 F. Supp. 6451994-04-13https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1742468/dunn-v-bergen-brunswig-drug-co/ . . . retaliatory discharge under Code of Virginia § 65.2-308. In Count II, plaintiff alleged a wrongful . . . District Court, E.D. VirginiaWarner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc.CIV. A. 3:00CV00092149 F. Supp. 2d 2462001-05-21https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2573616/warner-v-buck-creek-nursery-inc/ . . . ;s demand for a jury trial on her 65.2-308 claim). . . . District Court, W.D. VirginiaCooley v. Tyson Foods Inc.9813131999-04-16https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059772/cooley-v-tyson-foods-inc/ . . . manager, Leonard Parks. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Purcell v. Tidewater Const. Corp.941414458 S.E.2d 2911995-06-09https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060280/purcell-v-tidewater-const-corp/ . . . Corporation, on February 3, 1994, pursuant to Code § 65.2-308. Purcell alleged that Tidewater . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Shaw v. Titan Corp.971921498 S.E.2d 6961998-04-17https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059900/shaw-v-titan-corp/ . . . determination was governed by the language of Code § 65.2-308. 253 Va. at 193, 483 S.E.2d at 207. . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Taylor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Civil Action No. 4:03cv86376 F. Supp. 2d 6532005-07-11https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2469228/taylor-v-wal-mart-stores-inc/ . . . Virginia Code § 65.2-308[5] . . . District Court, E.D. VirginiaJordan v. Clay's Rest Home, Inc.961320483 S.E.2d 2031997-02-28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060073/jordan-v-clays-rest-home-inc/ . . . actions, such as Jordan's action under [Code] § 65.2-308" (employer shall not discharge . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>O'CONNELL v. Isocor Corp.Civ.A. CA-99-18-A56 F. Supp. 2d 6491999-07-13https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2449431/oconnell-v-isocor-corp/ . . . alleges wrongful termination under Virginia Code § 65.2-308, the provision that prohibits adverse . . . District Court, E.D. VirginiaOakley v. May Dept. Stores Co.2:98cv60017 F. Supp. 2d 5331998-09-25https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2488707/oakley-v-may-dept-stores-co/ . . . absence attributable to jury duty); Va.Code Ann. § 65.2-308 (Michie 1995) (allowing civil suits . . . District Court, E.D. Virginiahttp://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/65.2-308/6.2-302Judgment rate of interest/6.2-302//65.2-308/65.2/3/65.2-308No employer or person shall discharge an employee solely because the employee intends to file or has filed a claim under this title or has testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under this title. The discharge of a person who has filed a fraudulent claim is not a violation of this section.sectionAA1