7838178.01-420Virginia Decodedhttps://vacode.org2016Civil Remedies And ProcedureEvidenceMiscellaneous ProvisionsDepositions as basis for motion for summary judgment or to strike evidenceCode 1950, § 8-315.1; 1973, c. 483; 1977, c. 617; 1978, c. 417; 2013, c. 76.White v. MoranoRecord No. 940235452 S.E.2d 8561995-01-13https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1385381/white-v-morano/ . . . and conditions fixed by the judge. Id.; Code § 8.01-420.3. But one party is under no duty to . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>CARSON BY MEREDITH v. LeBlancRecord No. 920696427 S.E.2d 1891993-02-26https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1262778/carson-by-meredith-v-leblanc/ . . . ." Response: "Admitted." . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Khanna v. DOMINION BANK OF N. VA., NARecord No. 860588377 S.E.2d 3781989-03-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1392547/khanna-v-dominion-bank-of-n-va-na/ . . . discovery deposition testimony in violation of Code § 8.01-420, Rule 3:18, and Rule 4:7(e). This . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Gay v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.961214483 S.E.2d 2161997-02-28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060076/gay-v-norfolk-and-western-ry-co/ . . . summary judgment, relying on Rule 3:18 and Code § 8.01-420. The trial court held that Gay waived . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Lloyd v. Kime070190654 S.E.2d 5632008-01-11https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058550/lloyd-v-kime/ . . . quot; See also Code § 8.01-420. We have held that Rule 3:20 and Code § 8.01-420 "impose a very . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr> . . . Joe Leitman, D/B/A J.L. Surplus Sales, Surplus Sales v. . . . 90-1823934 F.2d 461991-06-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/561836/joe-leitman-dba-jl-surplus-sales-surplus-sales-v-lieutenant-general/ . . . admitted into evidence pursuant to Va.Code Sec. 8.01-420.2.5 . . . Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitWaller v. Com.0077952467 S.E.2d 8441996-03-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1068034/waller-v-com/ . . . court reporter, is self-authenticating. See Code § 8.01-420.3. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Parker v. Elco Elevator Corp.942042462 S.E.2d 981995-09-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060254/parker-v-elco-elevator-corp/ . . . judgment absent agreement of counsel. See also Code § 8.01-420. In the absence of a clear objection . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Smith v. Richmond Newspapers Inc.0003372001-01-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059519/smith-v-richmond-newspapers-inc/ . . . Finally, the Clerk asserts that Code § 8.01-420.3 and Rule . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Prosise v. Foster001074544 S.E.2d 3312001-04-20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059487/prosise-v-foster/ . . . addressing the summary judgment motion.[2]See Code § 8.01-420; Rule 3:18. Following oral argument, . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>White v. MoranoRecord No. 940235452 S.E.2d 8561995-01-13https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1385381/white-v-morano/ . . . and conditions fixed by the judge. Id.; Code § 8.01-420.3. But one party is under no duty to . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>CARSON BY MEREDITH v. LeBlancRecord No. 920696427 S.E.2d 1891993-02-26https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1262778/carson-by-meredith-v-leblanc/ . . . ." Response: "Admitted." . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Khanna v. DOMINION BANK OF N. VA., NARecord No. 860588377 S.E.2d 3781989-03-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1392547/khanna-v-dominion-bank-of-n-va-na/ . . . discovery deposition testimony in violation of Code § 8.01-420, Rule 3:18, and Rule 4:7(e). This . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Gay v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.961214483 S.E.2d 2161997-02-28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060076/gay-v-norfolk-and-western-ry-co/ . . . summary judgment, relying on Rule 3:18 and Code § 8.01-420. The trial court held that Gay waived . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Lloyd v. Kime070190654 S.E.2d 5632008-01-11https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058550/lloyd-v-kime/ . . . quot; See also Code § 8.01-420. We have held that Rule 3:20 and Code § 8.01-420 "impose a very . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr> . . . Joe Leitman, D/B/A J.L. Surplus Sales, Surplus Sales v. . . . 90-1823934 F.2d 461991-06-03https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/561836/joe-leitman-dba-jl-surplus-sales-surplus-sales-v-lieutenant-general/ . . . admitted into evidence pursuant to Va.Code Sec. 8.01-420.2.5 . . . Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitWaller v. Com.0077952467 S.E.2d 8441996-03-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1068034/waller-v-com/ . . . court reporter, is self-authenticating. See Code § 8.01-420.3. . . . <abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr>Parker v. Elco Elevator Corp.942042462 S.E.2d 981995-09-15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060254/parker-v-elco-elevator-corp/ . . . judgment absent agreement of counsel. See also Code § 8.01-420. In the absence of a clear objection . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Smith v. Richmond Newspapers Inc.0003372001-01-12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059519/smith-v-richmond-newspapers-inc/ . . . Finally, the Clerk asserts that Code § 8.01-420.3 and Rule . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>Prosise v. Foster001074544 S.E.2d 3312001-04-20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059487/prosise-v-foster/ . . . addressing the summary judgment motion.[2]See Code § 8.01-420; Rule 3:18. Following oral argument, . . . <abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/8.01-420//8.01-420/8.01/14/9/8.01-4208.01-696Except as provided in subsection B, no motion for summary judgment or to strike the evidence shall be sustained when based in whole or in part upon any discovery depositions under Rule 4:5, unless all parties to the suit or action shall agree that such deposition may be so used. Notwithstanding the foregoing, requests for admissions for which the responses are submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment may be based in whole or in part upon any discovery depositions under Rule 4:5 and may include admitted facts learned or referenced in such a deposition, provided that any such request for admission shall not reference the deposition or require the party to admit that the deponent gave specific testimony.sectionAA1Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection A, a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of any claim or demand for punitive damages may be sustained, as to the punitive damages claim or demand only, when based in whole or in part upon any discovery depositions under Rule 4:5. However, such a motion may not be based upon discovery depositions under Rule 4:5 with respect to any claim or demand for punitive damages based on the operation of a motor vehicle by a person while under the influence of alcohol, any narcotic drug, or any other self-administered intoxicant or drug.sectionBB1