<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><law_id>765798</law_id><section_number>8.01-430</section_number><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><edition url="https://vacode.org/2016/" id="11" last_updated="2016-07-24" current="TRUE">2016</edition><structure><unit level="1" identifier="8.01" url="https://vacode.org/2016/8.01/">Civil Remedies And Procedure</unit><unit level="2" identifier="17" url="https://vacode.org/2016/8.01/17/">Judgments And Decrees Generally</unit><unit level="3" identifier="1" url="https://vacode.org/2016/8.01/17/1/">In General</unit></structure><catch_line>When final judgment to be entered after verdict set aside</catch_line><history>Code 1950, &#xA7; 8-352; 1977, c. 617.</history><order_by/><metadata/><court_decisions><unit><name>Frye v. Com.</name><case_number>Record Nos. 850793, 850794</case_number><citation>345 S.E.2d 267</citation><date>1986-06-13</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1325116/frye-v-com/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. quot; punishment in criminal cases); cf. Code &#xA7; 8.01-430 (trial judge's discretion is limited .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Brown v. Koulizakis</name><case_number>Record No. 820473</case_number><citation>331 S.E.2d 440</citation><date>1985-06-14</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1210990/brown-v-koulizakis/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. evidence or without evidence to support it. Code &#xA7; 8.01-430. If this Court reaches a different .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Rogers v. Marrow by Marrow</name><case_number>Record No. 910218</case_number><citation>413 S.E.2d 344</citation><date>1992-01-10</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1330692/rogers-v-marrow-by-marrow/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. The court further ruled that, pursuant to Code &#xA7; 8.01-430,[2] there was sufficient evidence for it .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Lane v. Scott</name><case_number>Record No. 780278</case_number><citation>260 S.E.2d 238</citation><date>1979-11-21</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1334479/lane-v-scott/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. consider them the law of the case. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Coleman v. Blankenship Oil Corp.</name><case_number>Record No. 780859</case_number><citation>267 S.E.2d 143</citation><date>1980-06-06</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1326680/coleman-v-blankenship-oil-corp/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. the trial judge under Code &#xA7; 8-352 [now, Code &#xA7; 8.01-430] to set aside a jury verdict and enter .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Countryside Corp. v. Taylor</name><case_number>010729</case_number><citation>561 S.E.2d 680</citation><date>2002-04-19</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059342/countryside-corp-v-taylor/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Countryside filed a motion, pursuant to Code &#xA7; 8.01-430, to set aside the jury's verdict. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Poliquin v. Daniels</name><case_number>961719</case_number><citation>486 S.E.2d 530</citation><date>1997-06-06</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1060034/poliquin-v-daniels/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. evidence or without evidence to support it. Code &#xA7; 8.01-430; Brown, 229 Va. at 531, 331 S.E.2d at .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>BD. OF SUP'RS OF STAFFORD CTY. v. Safeco Ins.</name><case_number>Record No. 810319</case_number><citation>310 S.E.2d 445</citation><date>1983-12-02</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1207260/bd-of-suprs-of-stafford-cty-v-safeco-ins/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. . The "Revisers' Note" to Code &#xA7; 8.01-430 (Acts 1977, c. 617) explained that &#xA7; 8-353 was .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Allstate Insurance Company v. White</name><case_number>980386</case_number><citation/><date>1999-01-08</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059822/allstate-insurance-company-v-white/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;.  on the issue of liability pursuant to Code &#xA7; 8.01- .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit><unit><name>Jenkins v. Pyles</name><case_number>041892</case_number><citation>611 S.E.2d 404</citation><date>2005-04-22</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058970/jenkins-v-pyles/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 578, 581, 260 S.E.2d 238, 240 (1979); see Code &#xA7; 8.01-430. Thus, if the evidence is conflicting on .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>&lt;abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia"&gt;SCV&lt;/abbr&gt;</court_html></unit></court_decisions><official_url>http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/8.01-430/</official_url><refers_to/><url>/8.01-430/</url><token>8.01/17/1/8.01-430</token><referred_to_by/><text><section id="2467802" prefix=""><text>When the verdict of a jury in a civil action is set aside by a trial court upon the ground that it is contrary to the evidence, or without evidence to support it, a new trial shall not be granted if there is sufficient evidence before the court to enable it to decide the case upon its merits, but such final judgment shall be entered as to the court shall seem right and proper. If necessary to assess damages which have not been assessed, the court may empanel a jury at its bar to make such assessment, and then enter such final judgment.Nothing in this section contained shall be construed to give to trial courts any greater power over verdicts than they now have under existing rules of procedure, nor to impair the right to move for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence.</text><type>section</type><prefixes><section/></prefixes><entire_prefix/><prefix_anchor/><level>1</level></section></text></law>
