{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/18.2-152.11.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/18.2-152.11.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/18.2-152.11.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/18.2-152.11.html"}],"law_id":350339,"edition_id":2,"section_id":350339,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.11","catch_line":"Article not exclusive","history":"1984, c. 751.","full_text":"The provisions of this article shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal law of this Commonwealth which presently applies or may in the future apply to any transaction or course of conduct which violates this article, unless such provision is clearly inconsistent with the terms of this article.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1305327,"text":"The provisions of this article shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal law of this Commonwealth which presently applies or may in the future apply to any transaction or course of conduct which violates this article, unless such provision is clearly inconsistent with the terms of this article.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":50141,"edition_id":2,"name":"Computer Crimes","identifier":"7.1","label":"article","depth":3,"order_by":8,"parent_id":50135,"metadata":{"child_laws":19,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:23:11","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:30:18","permalink":{"id":1392761,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":50141,"identifier":"7.1","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1","url":"\/18.2\/5\/7.1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":50135,"edition_id":2,"name":"Crimes Against Property","identifier":"5","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":5,"parent_id":50131,"metadata":{"child_laws":153,"child_structures":10},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:22:59","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:30:17","permalink":{"id":1392301,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":50135,"identifier":"5","token":"18.2\/5","url":"\/18.2\/5\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":50131,"edition_id":2,"name":"Crimes and Offenses Generally","identifier":"18.2","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":52,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":960,"child_structures":94},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:22:59","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:30:15","permalink":{"id":1391141,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":50131,"identifier":"18.2","token":"18.2","url":"\/18.2\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":350338,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.1","catch_line":"Short title","url":"\/18.2-152.1\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.1","metadata":false},{"id":350339,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.11","catch_line":"Article not exclusive","url":"\/18.2-152.11\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.11","metadata":false},{"id":350340,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.12","catch_line":"Civil relief; damages","url":"\/18.2-152.12\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.12","metadata":false},{"id":350341,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.13","catch_line":"Repealed","url":"\/18.2-152.13\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.13","metadata":false},{"id":350342,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.14","catch_line":"Computer as instrument of forgery","url":"\/18.2-152.14\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.14","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Campbell v. Commonwealth","case_number":"Record 921406","citation":"431 S.E.2d 648","date":"1993-06-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1364586\/campbell-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 431 S.E.2d 648 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":350343,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.15","catch_line":"Encryption used in criminal activity","url":"\/18.2-152.15\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.15","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Maxient, LLC v. Symplicity Corp.","case_number":"Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1184 (AJT\/IDD)","citation":"63 F. Supp. 3d 592","date":"2014-10-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7310209\/maxient-llc-v-symplicity-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":350344,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.16","catch_line":"Repealed","url":"\/18.2-152.16\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.16","metadata":false},{"id":350346,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.2","catch_line":"Definitions; computer crimes","url":"\/18.2-152.2\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.2","metadata":false},{"id":350347,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.3","catch_line":"Computer fraud; penalty","url":"\/18.2-152.3\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.3","metadata":false},{"id":350348,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.3:1","catch_line":"Transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic mail (spam); penalty","url":"\/18.2-152.3_1\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.3_1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Jaynes v. Com.","case_number":"Record 062388.","citation":"666 S.E.2d 303","date":"2008-09-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058457\/jaynes-v-com\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 666 S.E.2d 303 (2008) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Jaynes v. Commonwealth","case_number":"Record 062388.","citation":"662 S.E.2d 502","date":"2008-05-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1208176\/jaynes-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 662 S.E.2d 502 (2008) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Jaynes v. Com.","case_number":"Record 062388.","citation":"657 S.E.2d 478","date":"2008-02-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1374657\/jaynes-v-com\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 657 S.E.2d 478 (2008) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Jaynes v. Commonwealth","case_number":"1054054","citation":"634 S.E.2d 357","date":"2006-09-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063170\/jaynes-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 634 S.E.2d 357 (2006) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Maxient, LLC v. Symplicity Corp.","case_number":"Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1184 (AJT\/IDD)","citation":"63 F. Supp. 3d 592","date":"2014-10-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7310209\/maxient-llc-v-symplicity-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"5":{"name":"Aitken v. Communications Workers of America","case_number":"1:06cv1161","citation":"496 F. Supp. 2d 653","date":"2007-07-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2350492\/aitken-v-communications-workers-of-america\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 496 F.Supp.2d 653 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":350349,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.4","catch_line":"Computer trespass; penalty","url":"\/18.2-152.4\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.4","metadata":false},{"id":350350,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.5","catch_line":"Computer invasion of privacy; penalties","url":"\/18.2-152.5\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.5","metadata":false},{"id":350351,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.5:1","catch_line":"Using a computer to gather identifying information; penalties","url":"\/18.2-152.5_1\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.5_1","metadata":false},{"id":350352,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.6","catch_line":"Theft of computer services; penalties","url":"\/18.2-152.6\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.6","metadata":false},{"id":350353,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.7","catch_line":"Personal trespass by computer; penalty","url":"\/18.2-152.7\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.7","metadata":false},{"id":350354,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.7:1","catch_line":"Harassment by computer; penalty","url":"\/18.2-152.7_1\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.7_1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Richard Turner Moter v. Commonwealth of Virginia","case_number":"1301112","citation":"61 Va. App. 471","date":"2013-02-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1061471\/richard-turner-moter-v-commonwealth-of-virginia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. KELSEY, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Cody W. Brewer v. Commonwealth of Virginia","case_number":"1665182","citation":null,"date":"2020-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4733874\/cody-w-brewer-v-commonwealth-of-virginia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Barson v. Com.","case_number":"111406","citation":"726 S.E.2d 292","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057880\/barson-v-com\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 292 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Barson v. Commonwealth","case_number":"2464091","citation":"711 S.E.2d 220","date":"2011-07-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1061920\/barson-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 711 S.E.2d 220 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"United States v. Williams","case_number":"08-5000","citation":"592 F.3d 511","date":"2010-01-21","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1031286\/united-states-v-williams\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 592 F.3d 511 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"5":{"name":"Taylor Amil Wallace v. Commonwealth of Virginia","case_number":"1040211","citation":null,"date":"2023-03-28","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9387189\/taylor-amil-wallace-v-commonwealth-of-virginia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. VIRGINIA: .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Taylor Amil Wallace v. Commonwealth of Virginia","case_number":"1040211","citation":null,"date":"2023-02-28","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9380130\/taylor-amil-wallace-v-commonwealth-of-virginia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Miller v. Washington Workplace, Inc.","case_number":"CIV.03-1110-A","citation":"298 F. Supp. 2d 364","date":"2004-01-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2564424\/miller-v-washington-workplace-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 298 F.Supp.2d 364 (2004) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Taylor Amil Wallace v. Commonwealth of Virginia","case_number":"1040211","citation":null,"date":"2024-01-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9468167\/taylor-amil-wallace-v-commonwealth-of-virginia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Steele v. Goodman","case_number":"Civil Action No. 3:17cv601","citation":"382 F. Supp. 3d 403","date":"2019-03-31","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7336073\/steele-v-goodman\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":350355,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.7:2","catch_line":"Using computer to commit a scheme involving false representations; penalty","url":"\/18.2-152.7_2\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.7_2","metadata":false},{"id":350356,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.8","catch_line":"Property capable of embezzlement","url":"\/18.2-152.8\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.8","metadata":false},{"id":350357,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.9","catch_line":"Repealed","url":"\/18.2-152.9\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.9","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":350338,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.1","catch_line":"Short title","url":"\/18.2-152.1\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.1","metadata":false},"next_section":{"id":350340,"structure_id":50141,"section_number":"18.2-152.12","catch_line":"Civil relief; damages","url":"\/18.2-152.12\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.12","metadata":false},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/18.2-152.11\/","history_text":"<p>This law was first created in 1984. The record of its establishment is cataloged in chapter 751 of that year\u2019s edition of \u201cActs of Assembly,\u201d the annual state publication listing all changes made to the Code of Virginia in that year. Unfortunately, the 1984 \u201cActs\u201d aren\u2019t available online.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":false,"permalink":{"id":1392767,"object_type":"law","relational_id":350339,"identifier":"18.2-152.11","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.11","url":"\/18.2-152.11\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/18.2-152.11\/","token":"18.2\/5\/7.1\/18.2-152.11","dublin_core":{"Title":"Article not exclusive","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 18.2-152.11","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>The provisions of this article shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal <span class=\"dictionary\">law<\/span> of this Commonwealth which presently applies or may in the future apply to any transaction or course of conduct which violates this article, unless such provision is clearly inconsistent with the terms of this article.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nARTICLE NOT EXCLUSIVE (\u00a7 18.2-152.11)\n\nThe provisions of this article shall not be construed to preclude the\napplicability of any other provision of the criminal law of this Commonwealth\nwhich presently applies or may in the future apply to any transaction or course\nof conduct which violates this article, unless such provision is clearly\ninconsistent with the terms of this article.\n\nHISTORY: 1984, c. 751.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}