{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/59.1-68.4.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/59.1-68.4.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/59.1-68.4.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/59.1-68.4.html"}],"law_id":373451,"edition_id":2,"section_id":373451,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.4","catch_line":"Suits by attorneys for the Commonwealth and city and county attorneys","history":"1974, c. 644; 1975, c. 43.","full_text":"Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law to the contrary, any attorney for the Commonwealth, or the attorney for any city or county, may investigate and cause to be brought suit in the name of the Commonwealth, or of the county or city, to enjoin any violation of Chapter 2.1 (\u00a7 59.1-21.1 et seq.) of this title and of Article 8 (\u00a7 18.2-214 et seq.), Chapter 6 of Title 18.2. The court having jurisdiction may enjoin such violations notwithstanding the existence of an adequate remedy at law. In any action under this section, it shall not be necessary that damages be alleged or proved.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1393844,"text":"Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law to the contrary, any attorney for the Commonwealth, or the attorney for any city or county, may investigate and cause to be brought suit in the name of the Commonwealth, or of the county or city, to enjoin any violation of Chapter 2.1 (\u00a7 59.1-21.1 et seq.) of this title and of Article 8 (\u00a7 18.2-214 et seq.), Chapter 6 of Title 18.2. The court having jurisdiction may enjoin such violations notwithstanding the existence of an adequate remedy at law. In any action under this section, it shall not be necessary that damages be alleged or proved.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":53146,"edition_id":2,"name":"Remedies for Violations of Preceding Chapters and Chapter 6, Article 8, of Title 18.2","identifier":"4.1","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":11,"parent_id":53010,"metadata":{"child_laws":4,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:11:34","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:36:20","permalink":{"id":1488719,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53146,"identifier":"4.1","token":"59.1\/4.1","url":"\/59.1\/4.1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":53010,"edition_id":2,"name":"Trade and Commerce","identifier":"59.1","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":127,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":861,"child_structures":141},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:09:52","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:36:19","permalink":{"id":1486523,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53010,"identifier":"59.1","token":"59.1","url":"\/59.1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":373449,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.2","catch_line":"Authority of Attorney General","url":"\/59.1-68.2\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.2","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Attorney General of the .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"90-2740","citation":"940 F.2d 73","date":"1991-08-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/565209\/mobil-oil-corporation-v-attorney-general-of-the-commonwealth-of-virginia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney General","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 3:90CV00381","citation":"747 F. Supp. 1173","date":"1990-10-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8707242\/mobil-oil-corp-v-attorney-general\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":373450,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.3","catch_line":"Action for damages or penalty for violation of Article 8, Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 or Chapter 2.1 of Title 59.1; attorney's fees","url":"\/59.1-68.3\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.3","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"BHR Recovery Cmtys., Inc. v. Top Seek, LLC","case_number":"Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00569-JAG","citation":"355 F. Supp. 3d 416","date":"2018-11-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7333813\/bhr-recovery-cmtys-inc-v-top-seek-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"Klaiber v. Freemason Associates, Inc.","case_number":"Record 022852; Record 022853","citation":"587 S.E.2d 555","date":"2003-10-31","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059167\/klaiber-v-freemason-associates-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 587 S.E.2d 555 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Parker-Smith v. Sto Corp.","case_number":"Record 002184","citation":"551 S.E.2d 615","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059437\/parker-smith-v-sto-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 551 S.E.2d 615 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Maldonado v. Nutri\/System, Inc.","case_number":"Civ. A. 91-0264-A, 91-0789-A","citation":"776 F. Supp. 278","date":"1991-10-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2340580\/maldonado-v-nutrisystem-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 776 F.Supp. 278 (1991) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"4":{"name":"McMillion v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.","case_number":"Record 002802","citation":"552 S.E.2d 364","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059440\/mcmillion-v-dryvit-systems-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 552 S.E.2d 364 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. American Demolition & Nuclear Decommissioning, Inc. v. IBCS .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action No. 3:11CV00078","citation":"21 F. Supp. 3d 632","date":"2014-05-13","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7306584\/american-demolition-nuclear-decommissioning-inc-v-ibcs-group-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"Vansant and Gusler, Inc. v. Washington","case_number":"Record 921223","citation":"429 S.E.2d 31","date":"1993-04-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1289233\/vansant-and-gusler-inc-v-washington\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 429 S.E.2d 31 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"East West, LLC v. Rahman","case_number":"No. 1:11cv1380 (JCC\/TCB)","citation":"873 F. Supp. 2d 721","date":"2012-06-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8716822\/east-west-llc-v-rahman\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Henry v. R. K. Chevrolet, Inc.","case_number":"Record No. 771357","citation":"219 Va. 1011","date":"1979-04-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/6927392\/henry-v-r-k-chevrolet-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PER CURIAM. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. H.D. Oliver Funeral Apartments, Inc. v. Dignity Funeral .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action 2:97cv218","citation":"964 F. Supp. 1033","date":"1997-05-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1410013\/hd-oliver-funeral-apartments-inc-v-dignity-funeral-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 964 F.Supp. 1033 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":373451,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.4","catch_line":"Suits by attorneys for the Commonwealth and city and county attorneys","url":"\/59.1-68.4\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.4","metadata":false},{"id":373452,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.5","catch_line":"Further provisions as to actions for violation of Article 8, Chapter 6 of Title 18.2","url":"\/59.1-68.5\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.5","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":373450,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.3","catch_line":"Action for damages or penalty for violation of Article 8, Chapter 6 of Title 18.2 or Chapter 2.1 of Title 59.1; attorney's fees","url":"\/59.1-68.3\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.3","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"BHR Recovery Cmtys., Inc. v. Top Seek, LLC","case_number":"Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00569-JAG","citation":"355 F. Supp. 3d 416","date":"2018-11-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7333813\/bhr-recovery-cmtys-inc-v-top-seek-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"Klaiber v. Freemason Associates, Inc.","case_number":"Record 022852; Record 022853","citation":"587 S.E.2d 555","date":"2003-10-31","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059167\/klaiber-v-freemason-associates-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 587 S.E.2d 555 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Parker-Smith v. Sto Corp.","case_number":"Record 002184","citation":"551 S.E.2d 615","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059437\/parker-smith-v-sto-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 551 S.E.2d 615 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Maldonado v. Nutri\/System, Inc.","case_number":"Civ. A. 91-0264-A, 91-0789-A","citation":"776 F. Supp. 278","date":"1991-10-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2340580\/maldonado-v-nutrisystem-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 776 F.Supp. 278 (1991) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"4":{"name":"McMillion v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.","case_number":"Record 002802","citation":"552 S.E.2d 364","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059440\/mcmillion-v-dryvit-systems-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 552 S.E.2d 364 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. American Demolition & Nuclear Decommissioning, Inc. v. IBCS .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action No. 3:11CV00078","citation":"21 F. Supp. 3d 632","date":"2014-05-13","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7306584\/american-demolition-nuclear-decommissioning-inc-v-ibcs-group-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"Vansant and Gusler, Inc. v. Washington","case_number":"Record 921223","citation":"429 S.E.2d 31","date":"1993-04-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1289233\/vansant-and-gusler-inc-v-washington\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 429 S.E.2d 31 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"East West, LLC v. Rahman","case_number":"No. 1:11cv1380 (JCC\/TCB)","citation":"873 F. Supp. 2d 721","date":"2012-06-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8716822\/east-west-llc-v-rahman\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Henry v. R. K. Chevrolet, Inc.","case_number":"Record No. 771357","citation":"219 Va. 1011","date":"1979-04-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/6927392\/henry-v-r-k-chevrolet-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PER CURIAM. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. H.D. Oliver Funeral Apartments, Inc. v. Dignity Funeral .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action 2:97cv218","citation":"964 F. Supp. 1033","date":"1997-05-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1410013\/hd-oliver-funeral-apartments-inc-v-dignity-funeral-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 964 F.Supp. 1033 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},"next_section":{"id":373452,"structure_id":53146,"section_number":"59.1-68.5","catch_line":"Further provisions as to actions for violation of Article 8, Chapter 6 of Title 18.2","url":"\/59.1-68.5\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.5","metadata":false},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/59.1-68.4\/","history_text":"<p>This law was first created in 1974. The record of its establishment is cataloged in chapter 644 of that year\u2019s edition of \u201cActs of Assembly,\u201d the annual state publication listing all changes made to the Code of Virginia in that year. Unfortunately, the 1974 \u201cActs\u201d aren\u2019t available online. It has been modified 1 time. Those modifications are cataloged by \u201cThe Acts of Assembly,\u201d a state publication, by year and chapter. Those modifications that can be read on the General Assembly\u2019s website will be linked accordingly. That modification is as follows: in 1975, chapter 43.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":[{"id":350474,"section_number":"18.2-214","catch_line":"Changing or removing, etc., trademarks, identification marks, etc","order_by":null,"url":"\/18.2-214\/"},{"id":372809,"section_number":"59.1-21.1","catch_line":"Citation of chapter","order_by":null,"url":"\/59.1-21.1\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1488729,"object_type":"law","relational_id":373451,"identifier":"59.1-68.4","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.4","url":"\/59.1-68.4\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/59.1-68.4\/","token":"59.1\/4.1\/59.1-68.4","dublin_core":{"Title":"Suits by attorneys for the Commonwealth and city and county attorneys","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 59.1-68.4","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>Notwithstanding any other provisions of the <span class=\"dictionary\">law<\/span> to the contrary, any attorney for the Commonwealth, or the attorney for any city or county, may investigate and cause to be brought suit in the name of the Commonwealth, or of the county or city, to enjoin any violation of Chapter 2.1 (\u00a7&nbsp;<a class=\"law\" title=\"Citation of chapter\" href=\"\/59.1-21.1\/\">59.1-21.1<\/a> et seq.) of this title and of Article 8 (\u00a7&nbsp;<a class=\"law\" title=\"Changing or removing, etc., trademarks, identification marks, etc\" href=\"\/18.2-214\/\">18.2-214<\/a> et seq.), Chapter 6 of Title 18.2. The <span class=\"dictionary\">court<\/span> having <span class=\"dictionary\">jurisdiction<\/span> may enjoin such violations notwithstanding the existence of an adequate remedy at <span class=\"dictionary\">law<\/span>. In any action under this section, it shall not be necessary that <span class=\"dictionary\">damages<\/span> be alleged or proved.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nSUITS BY ATTORNEYS FOR THE COMMONWEALTH AND CITY AND COUNTY ATTORNEYS (\u00a7\n59.1-68.4)\n\nNotwithstanding any other provisions of the law to the contrary, any attorney\nfor the Commonwealth, or the attorney for any city or county, may investigate\nand cause to be brought suit in the name of the Commonwealth, or of the county\nor city, to enjoin any violation of Chapter 2.1 (\u00a7 59.1-21.1 et seq.) of this\ntitle and of Article 8 (\u00a7 18.2-214 et seq.), Chapter 6 of Title 18.2. The court\nhaving jurisdiction may enjoin such violations notwithstanding the existence of\nan adequate remedy at law. In any action under this section, it shall not be\nnecessary that damages be alleged or proved.\n\nHISTORY: 1974, c. 644; 1975, c. 43.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}