<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>377204</law_id><section_number>8.01-37.1</section_number><catch_line>Claims for medical services provided by United States; proof of reasonable value</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="12" identifier="8.01">Civil Remedies and Procedure</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="5" identifier="3">Actions</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="3" identifier="3">Injury to Person or Property</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>Whenever any <span class="dictionary">person</span> <span class="dictionary">sustains</span> personal injuries caused by the alleged <span class="dictionary">negligence</span> of another, and a claim against any <span class="dictionary">person</span> alleged to be liable is created in favor of the United States under federal <span class="dictionary">law</span> (42 U.S.C. &#xA7;&#xA0;2651 et seq.) for the reasonable value of medical, surgical or dental care and treatment provided, the injured <span class="dictionary">party</span> may, on behalf of the United States, claim the reasonable value of the medical services provided as an element of <span class="dictionary">damages</span> in a <span class="dictionary">civil action</span> against the <span class="dictionary">person</span> alleged to be liable. It shall not be required that the United States intervene in the action or be made a <span class="dictionary">party</span> in <span class="dictionary">order</span> to establish its claim. A sworn written statement of the authorized representative of the department or agency providing such services prepared in accordance with the regulations promulgated pursuant to 42 U.S.C. &#xA7;&#xA0;2652 shall be <span class="dictionary">admissible</span> as <span class="dictionary">evidence</span> of the reasonable value of the care and treatment provided.</p></section></text><history>1984, c. 42; 1985, c. 205.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name>Hutto v. Bic Corp.</name><case_number>Civ. A. 91-644-N</case_number><citation>800 F. Supp. 1367</citation><date>1992-08-07</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1393546/hutto-v-bic-corp/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 800 F.Supp. 1367 (1992) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
