Optional form of county government; effect of change in form (§ 1-229)—Virginia Decoded

Optional form of county government; effect of change in form

Whenever any county, city, town, political subdivision, or combination thereof is identified in an act of the General Assembly by reference to its proximity to a county that has adopted an optional form of government provided in Title 15.2, and that county changes its form of government, the act shall continue to apply to such county, city, town, political subdivision, or combination thereof and shall cease to apply only upon the subsequent enactment by the General Assembly of a measure in which such intent clearly is stated.

History

1990, c. 253, § 1-13.35:1; 2005, c. 839.

Download

Court Decisions

. . . Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/08/63)
. . . Code of Virginia, 1960 §§ 19.1-229 et seq . . .

. . . Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/23/64)
. . . statute commands such an inquiry. Va.Code 1950, 19.1-229. See Wood v. Commonwealth, 146 Va. 296, . . .

. . . Sam Miller v. J. R. Blalock, M.D., Superintendent, . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 02/09/66)
. . . committed for observation prusuant to 19.1-228 or 19.1-229 to the department for the criminal insane . . .

. . . Jessie Kibert v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 09/01/67)
. . . §§ 19.1-227, 19.1-228, and 19.1-229. As we had occasion to observe in Thomas v. Cunningham . . .

Limonja v. Com. (COA, 08/15/89)
. . . a traffic infraction in violation of Code § 46.1-229.4. . . .

Owsley v. Cunningham (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 01/27/61)
. . . additional statutory provision, § 19-203 (now § 19.1-229), provides that if a court in which a . . .

Fishback v. Com. (SCV, 06/09/00)
. . . instructed about executive clemency, see Code §§ 53.1-229 through -231, or earned sentence . . .

. . . Philip J. Hirschkop, and American Civil Liberties Union of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 03/02/79)
. . . presently before us. See Virginia Code § 16.1-229, Et seq. (1975) (juvenile proceedings); Va. . . .

Copeland v. Com. (COA, 08/12/08)
. . . exclusive power over executive clemency, Code § 53.1-229, et seq. . . .

Diggs v. Com. (COA, 05/17/88)
. . . e.g., Code §§ 46.1-17, 46.1-171.1, 46.1-215.1, 46.1-229.1, 46.1-263. However, because the language . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.