Virginia

Decoded

Repealed by Acts 2013, cc. 756 and 793, cl. 2.

If you’re reading this for anything important, you should double-check its accuracy—read § 10.1-2100 on the official Code of Virginia website.

MARBLE TECHNOLOGIES v. City of Hampton (SCV, 02/25/10)
. . . the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Code §§ 10.1-2100 through -2115 (the Act), and its . . .
Cherrystone Inlet v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (SCV, 04/21/06)
. . . adopted the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Code § 10.1-2100, et seq. (The Bay Act). Pursuant to . . .
BD. OF SUP'RS OF PR. WILL. v. Omni Homes (SCV, 01/10/97)
. . . the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act. Code §§ 10.1-2100 through -2116. These regulations affected . . .
Concerned Citizens v. CHESAPEAKE BAY (COA, 02/09/93)
. . . Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (the Act), Code §§ 10.1-2100 et seq., was enacted by the General . . .
Turner v. Board of County Supervisors (SCV, 03/01/02)
. . . the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Code §§ 10.1-2100, et seq., and the related adoption of Best . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.