Repealed (§ 16.1-279)—Virginia Decoded

Repealed by Acts 1991, c. 534.

History

Court Decisions

Martin v. Department of Social Services (COA, 09/02/86)
. . . dispositional alternatives are initially found in Code | 16.1-279, and a final order of foster care . . .

Edwards v. Arlington County (COA, 11/04/87)
. . . harsh than terminating parental rights. Code § 16.1-279(A) provides several alternative remedies . . .

Jenkins v. WINCHESTER DSS (COA, 08/27/91)
. . . abuse and neglect was made pursuant to *20 Code § 16.1-279[1] and is in no way affected by the . . .

Elliott v. Com. (SCV, 04/17/09)
. . . violating a protective order issued pursuant to Code § 16.1-279.1. The issue we consider is the . . .

Norfolk Div. of Soc. Serv. v. Unknown Father (COA, 06/17/86)
. . . , but grandparents. . . .

Stanley v. Fairfax County DSS (SCV, 06/07/91)
. . . to terminate residual parental rights. Code §§ 16.1-279(A)(5), -283. . . .

Unknown Father of Baby Girl Janet v. DSS (COA, 09/22/92)
. . . notification requirement is found in Code § 16.1-279(B). Code § 16.1-279(B) sets forth what, if . . .

Goodwin v. Com. (COA, 11/19/96)
. . . protective order derived from Code §§ 16.1-278.14 and 16.1-279.1. The former states: . . .

Grogg v. Com. (COA, 08/16/88)
. . . transferred child in the manner prescribed by Code § 16.1-279 for disposition of cases in the . . .

Church v. Church (COA, 04/08/97)
. . . parental rights, acting pursuant to former Code § 16.1-279(A).[1] The decree also eliminated . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.

§ 16.1-279

Repealed

History

Download