When jury need not be kept together in felony case; sufficient compliance with requirement that jury be kept together (§ 19.2-264)—Virginia Decoded

When jury need not be kept together in felony case; sufficient compliance with requirement that jury be kept together

In any case of a felony the jury shall not be kept together unless the court otherwise directs. Whenever a jury is required to be kept together, it shall be deemed sufficient compliance although the court for good cause permits one or more of such jurors to be separated from the others; provided all such jurors, whether separated or not, be kept in charge of officers provided therefor.

History

Code 1950, §§ 8-208.31, 8-208.32; 1973, c. 439; 1975, c. 495.

Download

Court Decisions

Stamper v. Com. (SCV, 08/30/79)
. . . Justice. . . .

Smith v. Commonwealth (SCV, 10/06/78)
. . . and 31(e) and thereafter under Code | 19.2-264.2 through 19.2-264.5, the Jury heard evudence on the . . .

Coppola v. Com. (SCV, 08/30/79)
. . . in the separate proceeding required by Code §§ 19.2-264.3 and -264.4, the jury heard evidence as . . .

Clark v. Com. (SCV, 08/30/79)
. . . recommended that his punishment be death. Code §§ 19.2-264.3, -264.4. On November 21, 1978, a . . .

Mason v. Com. (SCV, 04/20/79)
. . . and sentenced defendant to be executed. Code § 19.2-264.5. . . .

Turner v. Com. (SCV, 11/26/80)
. . . bifurcated proceeding conducted pursuant to Code §§ 19.2-264.3 and -264.4, the jury fixed the . . .

. . . Mir Aimal Kasi v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 08/15/02)
. . . murder of Darling, see Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-264.4 (Michie 2000), after which the jury fixed . . .

Coleman v. Com. (SCV, 09/09/83)
. . . Review of the Death Sentence. . . .

LeVasseur v. Com. (SCV, 06/17/83)
. . . cases. . . .

Timothy Dale Bunch v. Charles Thompson, Warden, (Two Cases) (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 11/27/91)
. . . quot; of the crime. See Va.Code Ann. § 19.2-264.2 (1990). The conviction and sentence were . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.