Virginia

Decoded

Repealed by Acts 1983, c. 499.

If you’re reading this for anything important, you should double-check its accuracy—read § 16.1-114 on the official Code of Virginia website.

Gertler v. Bowling (SCV, 10/10/60)
. . . the defendants as bailees and, acting under | 16.1-114, Code of 1950, as amended, Acts of 1956, ch. . . .
Hurst v. Ballard (SCV, 11/27/85)
. . . ). . . .
COM., VA. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. Walker (SCV, 04/18/97)
. . . Appeals' conclusion that, based upon Code § 16.1-114.1, "equitable considerations" dictated… . . .
Burks v. Three Hills Corp. (SCV, 11/26/73)
. . . stated that the statutory predecessor to Code | 16.1-114 (Repl. Vol. 1960), which empowers the trial . . .
Scheer v. Isaacs (COA, 05/15/90)
. . . not permitting the appellant, pursuant to Code § 16.1-114.1[2] to continue his appeal. We disagree. . . .
Hutchins v. Carrillo (COA, 06/16/98)
. . . irregularities" covered by Code § 16.1-114.1. By its express terms, Code § 16.1-114.1 applies only . . .
Commonwealth/DSS v. Raymond M. Walker (COA, 04/09/96)
. . . at 205 (citing predecessor to current Code . . .
Christen Erickson Smiley v. Michael D. Erickson (COA, 04/06/99)
. . . - 6 - . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.