Extension of general powers for actions taken pursuant to a redevelopment plan (§ 36-50)—Virginia Decoded

Extension of general powers for actions taken pursuant to a redevelopment plan

In undertaking actions pursuant to a redevelopment plan, an authority shall have all the rights, powers, privileges, and immunities provided in this chapter. However, nothing contained in §§ 36-21 and 36-22 shall be construed as limiting the power of an authority, in the event of a default (including failure of compliance with a redevelopment plan) by a purchaser or lessee of land in a redevelopment plan, to acquire property and operate it free from the restrictions contained in §§ 36-21 and 36-22; and provided further, that any property which an authority leases to nongovernmental persons or entities for redevelopment under a redevelopment plan shall have the same tax status as if such leased property were owned by such nongovernmental persons or entities.

History

1946, p. 279; Michie Suppl. 1946, § 3145(8c); 2006, c. 784.

Download

Court Decisions

Hunter v. Redevelopment Authority (SCV, 11/30/53)
. . . eminent domain or purchase, * * *)". Code, | 36-50. . . .

Housing Authority v. Denton (SCV, 06/18/56)
. . . authority and not to the city council. Code, || 36-19, 36-50. The functions of the council are to . . .

Duke v. United States (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/14/37)
. . . 25 L.Ed. 244; Agnew v. United States, 165 U.S. 36, 50, 17 S.Ct. 235, 41 L.Ed. 624; United States v. . . .

COM. OF VA. STATE EDUC. ASSISTANCE AUTH. v. Dillon (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 03/09/95)
. . . , clothing and shelter, of $100 for telephone, $36.50 for cable television, $75 for recreation, and . . .

. . . United States v. Charles Thomas Dickerson, Washington Legal . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 02/08/99)
. . . Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36, 50 n. 16, 97 S.Ct. 2549, 53 L.Ed.2d 568 . . .

Norfolk Housing v. C and C Real Estate (SCV, 06/08/06)
. . . exceeded the authorization contained in Code § 36-50.1(4), and that under the Plan, C & C . . .

. . . Lee-Moore Oil Company v. Union Oil Company of California, . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 05/21/79)
. . . Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., 433 U.S. 36, 50, 97 S.Ct. 2549, 53 L.Ed.2d 568 . . .

United States v. Caro (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 03/17/10)
. . . remorse), United States v. Roman, 371 F.Supp.2d 36, 50 (D.P.R. 2005) (holding that during a capital . . .

. . . Tfws, Incorporated, T/a Beltway Fine Wine and Spirits v. . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 03/01/01)
. . . Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., 433 U.S. 36, 50 (1977) (quoting Northern Pac. R. Co. . . .

United States v. Alejandro Umana (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 08/12/14)
. . . . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.