Superintendents and agents of facilities to have powers of sheriff (§ 66-21)—Virginia Decoded

Superintendents and agents of facilities to have powers of sheriff

The superintendents of the facilities established by the Department pursuant to § 66-13 and their authorized agents shall have the powers of a sheriff for the purpose of preserving order at their facilities and for the conveyance of children committed to their care to and from such facilities.

History

Code 1950, §§ 53-332, 63-371, 63.1-247; 1968, c. 578; 1974, cc. 44, 45; 1981, c. 487; 1982, c. 636, § 53.1-246; 1989, c. 733.

Download

Court Decisions

Brown v. Commonwealth (SCV, 06/10/77)
. . . exigencies of the case demand." 180 Va. at 65-66, 21 S.E.2d at 767. . . .

. . . United States v. Richard Thomas Stitt, A/K/A Patrick v. . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 05/25/01)
. . . or allowed in this section. . . .

. . . William A. Moore v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 07/13/77)
. . . Harbor Commissioners, 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 57, 65-66, 21 L.Ed. 798 (1873): . . .

United States v. William Charles Eppinette, Jr. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 10/03/73)
. . . .Ed.2d 1366, reh. denied 393 U.S. 898, 89 S.Ct. 66, 21 L.Ed.2d 185; United States v. Smith (D.C.Iowa . . .

Medley v. School Board of City of Danville, Virginia (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 10/20/72)
. . . Park Avenue N 1-6 246 66 21.15 1-6 261 48 15.53 . . .

Tattoo Art, Inc. v. Tat International, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 06/29/11)
. . . and royalties." Id. 25:3-4 (DuFresne Test.), 66:21-23 & 67:19-20. . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.