Prohibited conduct concerning personal interest in a transaction (§ 30-108)—Virginia Decoded

Prohibited conduct concerning personal interest in a transaction

A legislator who has a personal interest in a transaction shall disqualify himself from participating in the transaction.Unless otherwise prohibited by the rules of his house, the disqualification requirement of this section shall not prevent any legislator from participating in discussions and debates, provided (i) he verbally discloses the fact of his personal interest in the transaction at the outset of the discussion or debate or as soon as practicable thereafter and (ii) he does not vote on the transaction in which he has a personal interest.

History

1987, Sp. Sess., c. 1, § 2.1-639.38; 2001, c. 844.

Download

Court Decisions

. . . 53 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1354, 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,124, 5 . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 08/03/90)
. . . authorization from Congress. 484 U.S. at 527-30, 108 S.Ct. at 823-25. . . .

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 09/14/05)
. . . fairness." Stewart Org., Inc., 487 U.S. at 30, 108 S.Ct. 2239. See also Brock v. Entre Computer . . .

FRONTLINE TEST EQUIPMENT v. Greenleaf Software (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 06/03/98)
. . . expression of their venue preferences. . . .

Phillips v. Bottoms (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 12/15/00)
. . . Agency & Service, Inc., 486 U.S. 825, 829-30, 108 S.Ct. 2182, 100 L.Ed.2d 836 (1988), that . . .

Optical Cable Corp. v. MASS. ELEC. CONST. CO. (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 05/01/98)
. . . California. See Stewart Organization, 487 *592 U.S. at 30, 108 S.Ct. 2239. The factors which bear on . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.