Repealed (§ 5.1-2)—Virginia Decoded

Repealed by Acts 1979, c. 272.

History

Court Decisions

. . . United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Certain . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 11/06/61)
. . . 7 % . . .

. . . 1 Fair empl.prac.cas. 488, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9741 Grace . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/06/66)
. . . embarrassing him; still another was 56 years old, 5 feet 5 1/2 inches in height and weighed 219 . . .

. . . Tony Zbosnik v. Badger Coal Company and Director, Office of . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 04/25/85)
. . . hundred feet, while working in a tunnel 4 1/2 to 5 1/2 feet high. After finding himself no longer . . .

. . . National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 10/25/91)
. . . cause of action accrued, until a five-and-one-half (5 1/2) year grace period provided in the . . .

Mears v. Mears (SCV, 09/10/65)
. . . the specified period; and, as provided in Rule 5:1, | 2, to file with the clerk means to "deliver . . .

. . . Earl W. Rickman, Jr. v. Deere & Company John Deere Company . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 09/20/94)
. . . that, if the master shield was in place, 3 1/2 to 5 1/2 inches of the drive shaft would have been . . .

Vepco v. Mabin (SCV, 04/23/62)
. . . horizontally at the front of the house and 2 feet 5 1/2 inches vertically and 4 1/2 inches . . .

Grasty v. Tanner (SCV, 01/17/66)
. . . its long main frame, which was 4 1/2 inches by 5 1/2 inches, 1/8 of an inch thick, pushed back four . . .

. . . Major Media of the Southeast, Inc., D/B/A Naegele Outdoor . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/12/86)
. . . given a grace period, but had to be removed within 5 1/2 years from October 23, 1983, unless they . . .

. . . Jonathan Spielberg, a Minor, by His Parents, Howard and . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 09/22/88)
. . . day while living at home. He would attend school 5- 1/2 hours per day during a nine month school . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.