Repealed (§ 5.1-6)—Virginia Decoded

Repealed by Acts 1988, c. 45.

History

Court Decisions

Hundley v. Commonwealth (SCV, 03/10/52)
. . . for unnecessary printing in violation of Rule 5:1, | 6(e). This motion was overruled because when . . .

DeMott v. DeMott (SCV, 04/23/56)
. . . or with the clerk of the appellate court. Rule 5:1, | 6(a). In the present case the appellee did . . .

Whitlow v. Grubb (SCV, 06/18/56)
. . . no objections are raised thereto violates Rule 5:1 | 6(e) of the Rules of Court. Appellant's . . .

Reserve Insurance Company v. Odham (COA, 06/11/62)
. . . the appeal was allowed in accordance with Rule 5:1, §§ 6 (a) and 6(d), Rules of Court. However, . . .

Gabbard v. Knight (SCV, 09/02/60)
. . . not designated for printing as required by Rule 5:1, | 6. The intent and purpose of this Rule is to . . .

Gaumont v. Highway Commissioner (SCV, 04/27/64)
. . . and they are not in the printed record. Rule 5:1, | 6(f), requires that all matters germane to . . .

Taylor v. Wood (SCV, 03/07/60)
. . . germane to the errors assigned, as required by Rule 5:1, | 6. For reasons to be stated, the motion . . .

Realty Corporation v. City of Norfolk (SCV, 01/20/58)
. . . in the record and will not be considered. Rule 5:1, | 6(f). There were no objections to the . . .

Andrews v. Cahoon (COA, 03/07/55)
. . . appeal and assignments of error. * * *" . . .

Farrow v. Commonwealth (SCV, 10/10/55)
. . . Commonwealth, 193 Va. 612, 615, 70 S.E.(2d) 293; Rule 5:1, | 6(f). Yet we find that both the . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.

§ 5.1-6

Repealed

History

Download