Conveyance of land to trustees or local governing body for cemetery use (§ 57-22)—Virginia Decoded

Conveyance of land to trustees or local governing body for cemetery use

A. Land may be conveyed to trustees, not less than five nor more than nine in number, for the use of any city, town, county, magisterial district, cemetery association, ecclesiastical or other society, as a cemetery. It shall be held by such trustees and their successors for such use and no other.

B. Land may also be conveyed to a county, city or town, in the name of the county, city or town, for use as a cemetery. Any perpetual care fund associated with the land or cemetery shall also be transferred upon such conveyance.

History

Code 1919, § 50; 1997, c. 132.

Download

Court Decisions

. . . The School Board of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia, . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 03/25/57)
. . . the administrative steps set forth in Section 26-57 [22-57] Code of Virginia 1950, in that, they . . .

Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. Waugh (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/03/35)
. . . . 669; Commercial Nat. Bank v. Davidson, 18 Or. 57, 22 P. 517; Levens v. Briggs, 21 Or. 333, 28 P. . . .

. . . United States Department of Interior v. James W. Elliott, . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 05/06/85)
. . . Moore & L. King, Collier on Bankruptcy p 57.22, p. 386 (14th ed. 1977) (emphasis in original). . . .

Sweet Briar Institute v. Button (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 07/14/67)
. . . 1950, §§ 23-9, 25-46.6, 58-12, 58-128, 19.1-28, 42-57, 22-221, 15.1-139, 55-27, 55-28, 55-30, . . .

In Re Metz (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, 08/22/79)
. . . 86 L.Ed. 1766; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy Section 57.22, et seq. . . .

United States Dept. of the Interior v. Elliott (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 05/31/84)
. . . penalties or forfeitures. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 57.22[1] at 381-82 (14th ed. 1977). The statute . . .

Omega Homes, Inc. v. Citicorp Acceptance Co. (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 03/10/87)
. . . Fortner I) 394 U.S. 495, 498-99, 89 S.Ct. 1252, 1256-57, 22 L.Ed.2d 495 (1969); Barber & Ross, . . .

Pully v. IRS (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 05/31/96)
. . . of action. See 6A Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 57.22[2] (Matthew Bender 1996). Pully cannot evade . . .

Qingyun Li v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 12/02/11)
. . . turbed. (Tr. of October 27, 2011 Oral Arg. at 21:57-22:32.) . . .

. . . 18 Fair empl.prac.cas. 171, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8627 . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 09/13/78)
. . . ) 58.9% 41.1% . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.