Compliance with Rules of Supreme Court (§ 8.01-271)—Virginia Decoded

Subject to the provisions of this title, pleadings shall be in accordance with Rules of the Supreme Court.

History

1977, c. 617.

Court Decisions

Oxenham v. Johnson (SCV, 03/01/91)
. . . whether, and under what circumstances, the Code § 8.01-271.1 duty of "reasonable inquiry" . . .

Tullidge v. BOARD OF SUP'RS (SCV, 04/20/90)
. . . an order imposing sanctions pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1, the dispositive issue is whether a pro . . .

Nedrich v. Jones (SCV, 04/16/93)
. . . the plaintiff's attorney, pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1. . . .

Williams & Connolly v. People (SCV, 04/20/07)
. . . discretion in imposing sanctions under Code § 8.01-271.1 against six attorneys and their . . .

Richardson v. Richardson (SCV, 09/20/91)
. . . award her attorney's fees pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1. We will not consider this assignment . . .

Lannon v. Lee Conner Realty Corp. (SCV, 11/10/89)
. . . opposition to Mrs. Lannon's exceptions. . . .

Nusbaum v. Berlin (SCV, 03/02/07)
. . . for conduct that did not violate either Code § 8.01-271.1 or Rule 4:12(b). He noted that the . . .

Gilmore v. Finn (SCV, 03/03/00)
. . . that was not in violation of Code § 8.01-271.1. . . .

Ford Motor Co. v. Benitez (SCV, 01/12/07)
. . . grounded in fact" in violation of Code § 8.01-271.1. . . .

Sheets v. Castle (SCV, 03/01/02)
. . . interpreted, or the sanctions provisions of Code § 8.01-271.1. However, on this record, the trial . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.

§ 8.01-271

Compliance with Rules of Supreme Court

History

Download