Repealed (§ 18.2-268)—Virginia Decoded

Repealed by Acts 1992, c. 830.

History

Court Decisions

Com. v. Rafferty (SCV, 03/01/91)
. . . quot; Code § 18.1-55.1(p), later Code § 18.2-268(p), now § 18.2-268(V), as amended. . . .

Brooks v. City of Newport News (SCV, 10/15/82)
. . . April 13, 1981, possess a valid license. . . .

Driver v. Com. (COA, 08/16/88)
. . . take a blood or breath test as required by Code § 18.2-268. Because the record does not reflect why . . .

Breeden v. Com. (COA, 09/29/92)
. . . to both a blood test and a breath test. Code § 18.2-268(B). If properly confronted, all drivers . . .

Essex v. Com. (SCV, 10/12/84)
. . . purposes of the drunken driving prosecution. Code § 18.2-268 provides that a certificate attesting . . .

Rasmussen v. Com. (COA, 12/28/99)
. . . breath. His objection was based on Code §§ 18.2-268.2 and 18.2-268.9. By its order of June 11, . . .

Rollins v. Com. (COA, 10/30/01)
. . . Code § 18.2-268.11 provides, in pertinent part: . . .

United States v. James M. Rowe (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 06/20/79)
. . . breathalyzer test in violation of Sections 18.2-266 and 18.2-268 respectively of the Code of . . .

Stevens v. Com. (COA, 08/09/05)
. . . the implied consent law (Code §§ 18.2-268.6, 18.2-268.7 and 18.2-268.11). In 2004, the General . . .

Davis v. Com. (COA, 06/06/89)
. . . in accordance with the provisions of *12 Code § 18.2-268. On appeal, Davis phrases the issues to be . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.

§ 18.2-268

Repealed

History

Download