Delinquency prevention and youth development programs; agents (§ 66-26)—Virginia Decoded

Delinquency prevention and youth development programs; agents

The Director shall develop and supervise delinquency prevention and youth development programs in order that better services and coordination of services are provided to children. The Director shall have the authority to appoint necessary agents for the carrying out of these programs as may be needed. To this end the Director shall cooperate with state and local authorities in establishing and maintaining suitable delinquency prevention and youth development programs.

History

Code 1950, § 53-19.22:1; 1974, c. 496; 1979, c. 700; 1982, c. 636, § 53.1-251; 1989, c. 733.

Download

Court Decisions

. . . United States v. Brian A. Moreland, United States of America . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 02/22/06)
. . . review for reasonableness, see id. at 765-66. . . .

. . . Sandra K. Hughes v. Morris Bedsole, Both Individually and in . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 03/15/95)
. . . was going to check the doors. Id. at 63-66. . . .

. . . United States v. United States District Court for the . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/21/57)
. . . judicial inquiry', Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 66, 26 S.Ct. 370, 375, 50 L.Ed. 652, of the most . . .

Tanglewood Mall, Inc. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BK.(NAT. ASS'N) (District Court, W.D. Virginia, 02/07/74)
. . . exception to § 94 set forth in Casey v. Adams, 102 U.S. 66, 26 L.Ed. 52 (1880). In carving out an . . .

Robert F. Lundy v. Internal Revenue Service (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/30/95)
. . . from the time the tax was paid. . . .

. . . The Potomac Electric Power Company v. Stephen H. Sachs, in . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 10/17/86)
. . . S.Ct. at 542, quoting Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 66, 26 S.Ct. 370, 375, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906). See . . .

In Re LCS Homes, Inc. (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, 07/25/89)
. . . 1983) (same); cf. Morotock Ins. Co., 94 Va. at 365-66, 26 S.E. at 852 (a warranty differs from a . . .

Federal Ins. Co. v. Smith (District Court, E.D. Virginia, 05/30/01)
. . . v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co., 104 U.S. 54, 66, 26 L.Ed. 693 (1881) ("If the money deposited . . .

. . . Board of County Supervisors of the County of Henrico, . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 04/09/74)
. . . time. This permit was designated UP 22-66. . . .

Court opinions are provided by CourtListener, which is developed by the Free Law Project.